Book Review – Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer

Into_the_Wild_(book)_coverTitle: Into the Wild

Author: Jon Krakauer

Publisher: Villard, 1996

Pages: Paperback Edition, 224 pages

Rating: 3 /5

I don’t really prefer Krakauer’s journalistic writing style. Rather than a book, I felt like I were reading a very long story in a newspaper, which makes sense because this “book” is just an expansion of an article he wrote for the January ’93 issue of Outside magazine.

At one point, there were about five pages of Krakauer’s personal experience and details of his family life and I was in awe of how a person can so blatantly use another person’s death as a promotional tool for oneself.

That said, his writing was fairly intelligent — although he couldn’t seem to make up his mind on certain things, often giving a contradictory statement to what he had just written a few paragraphs before.

Chris McCandless’ death is tragic, absolutely. Death is always tragic, especially for someone so young and with so much potential. However, he ignored common sense and died as a result of his own arrogance and unwillingness to heed caution to people with more experience than he possessed.

The sort of hero worship the author has for his subject matter was also very off putting for me. Speaking so highly of McCandless, you’d think he was overlooking how damaged and selfish Chris was in his lifetime, always in search of new experiences and mistreating the people that cared about him, much like Chris seemed to look over his own idols’ flaws in the ways of Jack London or Thoreau.

I did, however, like the other people that Chris meets and knows. From his trip through the desert to working his way up to Fairbanks, he did meet some very interesting people and I enjoyed reading the bits of history and factoids that Krakauer shared about them.

All in all, I would give it a 3 out of 5. Very informative and paints a beautiful picture of the great American dream of freedom, self-discovery and idealism, but in the end you have to take it for what it is — a story about a selfish’s boy’s unfortunate (and completely avoidable) demise in the Alaskan wilderness that left many people heartbroken and with unanswered questions. I don’t find anything noble, courageous or brave about that.

** NOTE: According to Krakauer, Chris died of poisoning from some of the seeds/roots he ate. He states this matter-of-factly in the book (and in the film adaptation), but THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO SCIENCE TO SUPPORT THIS. In fact, there is SCIENCE that specifically proves that he did NOT die from being poisoned, but from general malnutrition coupled with the fact that he could not get himself out of the bush. Scientists tore the plants apart and did tests on Chris himself, and the definitive ruling was that his cause of death was starvation, not poisoning or starvation as a result of poisoning.

There was a possibility that it was the mold on the ingested roots/seeds that are what poisoned Chris, and Krakauer took this possibility and spat it out as fact. It is not fact, and it upsets me that people take this at face value from watching the film or reading the book without actually investigating the cause of death. Chris’ lack of preparation and skill are what caused his death. It’s tragic and unfortunate, but scientifically proven and factual. Trying to put blame upon something that would have been out of Chris’ control (similar plants, mold growing on seeds, etc) further goes to support my claims of the “hero worship” displayed by Krakauer on the subject.

2 thoughts on “Book Review – Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer

  1. I also got very irritated with Jon’s style of writing. At many points, it was almost seeming like he was writing about his own thoughts rather than Chris’s story, which was the reason why people pick this book up to read. Also, i felt that somewhere he was trying to validate his own life’s decisions using Chris’s story, and thus, the hero worship element. I loved the movie more, though. 🙂

    1. I also liked the movie much more than the book! Although, again, with that ending, it’s completely false and it is really upsetting to me that this guy is dead and that the cause of his death is being misconstrued to avoid placing the blame where it belongs — ON CHRIS! People hate to speak ill of the dead, and I understand that his death is a terrible thing, but it was SO avoidable! He didn’t have to die! He could have met so many more people! He was sick of how selfish and materialistic everybody was, and yet he did the most selfish thing of all — Took himself from the people who care most about him, neglected safety and health precautions, and died because of it!

      I definitely see what you’re saying about Jon using Chris’ story to back up his own life stories. HIGHLY inappropriate, imho! This is NOT the platform to boast of your accomplishments and of all the mountains and wilderness trails you’ve traversed! Someone is DEAD! And instead of being honest about the subject, you’re floating over it with this whimsical, Jack London BS! D:

      Thank you so much for sharing your point of view with me! 🙂

Have something to say? Tell me!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: